From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 6 08:38:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E266716A4DD for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe04.swip.net [212.247.154.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9930743D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:38:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-T2-Posting-ID: gvlK0tOCzrqh9CPROFOFPw== X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from mp-217-36-85.daxnet.no ([193.217.36.85] verified) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 227889286; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:38:36 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:38:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <44ACC966.8030009@swehack.se> In-Reply-To: <44ACC966.8030009@swehack.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607061038.42503.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: nocturnal Subject: Re: Lowering USB Transfer Rate? X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 08:38:40 -0000 On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:27, nocturnal wrote: > Hi > > I'm not sure if that's what i want to do but the story is i lost the USB > cable for my mp3 player and i honestly have no idea if it was USB 1 or > 2. So i took the cable from my lacie hdd and tried to mount the mp3 > player but the system locked up and was rebooted. Each of these devices > work just fine with their original cables. I suspected maybe that the > lacie usb cable was usb 2.0 and that the transfer rate was too high, i > honestly have no idea but it sounds like different usb protocols need > different cables. Does anyone know what the problem is and is it > possible to force usb 1.0 transfer? If you don't load the "ehci" module then all devices will attach as USB 1.x. --HPS