From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 18 11:28:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9111065670 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F002F8FC08 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D117614E5ADD; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:11:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9VaaO5E2LVOz; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [193.137.158.178] (unknown [193.137.158.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8BFA14E5AF0; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:11:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E241503.20401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:12:03 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <20110717024710.GA19599@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20110717024710.GA19599@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: small patch to linux_base files for package building X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:28:08 -0000 Em 17-07-2011 03:47, Mark Linimon escreveu: > pointyhat makes its INDEX file elsewhere from the client environment. > Thus, the test for ${SYSCTL} -n compat.linux.osrelease might or might > not match the clients. > > I want to put in the following patch in each of the Makefiles to be > able to force the INDEX (same patch for each one). Any objections? > No strong objection from me, however, I would definitely be happier to see this code as part of bsd.port.mk as I proposed in ports/135221: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/135221 It would result in cleaner Makefiles and less duplicated code to put the logic into bsd.port.mk and conditionally disable the check there. Gabor Kovesdan