Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 03:55:36 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: dan_partelly <dan_partelly@rdsor.ro> Cc: Matthew Macy <mmacy@nextbsd.org>, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> Subject: Re: End of year Xorg status rant Message-ID: <20170101095536.GA5573@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <7dc8c4d9d9cdcb9bc0521d53cf94e04b@193.231.238.8> References: <20161230163653.54909631@rsbsd.rsb> <15952279f17.e0be0d8c34357.732964216134709731@nextbsd.org> <20161231120453.13adf858@thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <20161231145143.18e6ac99@rsbsd.rsb> <1595742b65f.1050eb06862309.1096856657498598610@nextbsd.org> <20170101081136.GA5399@lonesome.com> <7dc8c4d9d9cdcb9bc0521d53cf94e04b@193.231.238.8>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 11:36:38AM +0200, dan_partelly wrote: > With all due respect, you guys need to take more seriously the process > and politics of contributions to FreeBSD. I've been trying to promote this for years and have made inadequate progress. What are your suggestions? > Especially the core, they should make this a priority. Everyone seems to think core "drives" the project. It doesn't. It is more of a governing body. Should it be more active? Opinions vary. > The time frame for review is way too big Agreed. I've not accomplished what I wanted to here, either. What are your suggestions? > There is also something which I perceive as a lack of direction in > the project. It's a collective, not a hierarchy. People work on what they want to work on. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170101095536.GA5573>