Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 20:59:57 +0000 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> To: Alan Cox <alc@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r356207 - in head/sys/arm64: arm64 include Message-ID: <0100016f589bb7ad-b6389405-4433-4559-a9e0-9ce31a192a00-000000@email.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <201912302030.xBUKUWAO044693@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201912302030.xBUKUWAO044693@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2019-12-30 12:30, Alan Cox wrote: > Author: alc > Date: Mon Dec 30 20:30:31 2019 > New Revision: 356207 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356207 > > Log: > Determine whether the MMU hardware is capable of updating a page table > entry's access flag and dirty state, and enable this feature when it's > available. Am I right in thinking that this should result in improved performance under load? (I'm wondering if it's time to redo my amd64 vs arm64 EC2 benchmarks.) -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0100016f589bb7ad-b6389405-4433-4559-a9e0-9ce31a192a00-000000>