Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:50:00 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org> To: Alberto Villa <avilla@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: MAINTAINER lines and Real Names Message-ID: <CAHrWK2nrLzg4ebLbgoydZ%2BfFst2jx_zvDL8BQMjv64-vk5OQFg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJp7RHZqdAh47iF5C7NQRYadLPWroHcjVDE_%2BptMOZ99eX7JYw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADLo83925NLoD_-hAvUp7V8o6CAhqRQPcC_qrY3hEtEJc%2B%2B_fQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJp7RHZqdAh47iF5C7NQRYadLPWroHcjVDE_%2BptMOZ99eX7JYw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Like with Apache, x 11, or perl? Trying to get something there committed it's like pulling tiger teeth with a pair of pliers. return I agree multiple maintainers is a bad idea. If someone is technical enough to want to maintain that, they can always use an alias it goes to a group. Oh, were talking to Apache x 11 or Perl again -- Michael Scheidell Will Hack For Food On Sep 11, 2012 5:46 PM, "Alberto Villa" <avilla@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > > As a nice extra, it would also on the surface support multiple > > maintainers.... and make maintainer would still only return the first > > match. > > Multiple maintainers? It's the best way to make no one responsible for > a port: "Should I handle the update? Oh, no matter, $someone will do > it". ;) > -- > Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avilla@FreeBSD.org> > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHrWK2nrLzg4ebLbgoydZ%2BfFst2jx_zvDL8BQMjv64-vk5OQFg>