From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 27 22:01:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3498F9 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 22:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com (mail-qe0-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23498FE4 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 22:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q19so3915911qeb.4 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PspUPn15WeVzSfc2pvInauk51yvycUsGlIBEGiVRxGM=; b=r0gZ8O4670pEh26eCiNoS47OGJS/4sk7SwoYWc+B2C3Xf9GNwX6C0fpwX6Htgd0nXM Ab7dvoDDdfMWVc8Y1KBu6c7tSs5UUrCOoZfn1u3KdAtmlxnTlGekb01MWWOODBEoPlbv kw7objjSwgsTSmeI/JUOzK1yjEIukCnV7qp9jt9NzOkOaFnl7dwc2RnrvRFXSN04n7zy jmEVDnOWZg1qyiq+VPCZJ2WVSIbt6btdrXOluYwbradIl7zZbUm+4ztILZJS9KWsbkSR IX+J6WtDMUfaCCYWH7i2UAoi91E+qqCW+UUlhFO2flG9+JGuijwmO+8dSS47RBht3jte mPEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.51.166 with SMTP id l6mr34358367qeo.4.1369692103227; Mon, 27 May 2013 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.3.72 with HTTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk> References: <1369665048044-5815448.post@n5.nabble.com> <1369679542074-5815520.post@n5.nabble.com> <20130528001340.393804429748c30d19c02ce3@gmail.com> <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 01:01:43 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is latest portsnap snapshot corrupted? From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Bruce Cran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 22:01:45 -0000 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 27/05/2013 22:13, G=C3=B6k=C5=9Fin Akdeniz wrote: >> >> Ia am not a dev, but portstree snapshot is fixed. Simply run >> >> '# portsnap fetch extract && portsdb -u' >> >> and you will get a fresh snapshot of ports tree. >> > > Is '# portsnap fetch update' not sufficient? It seemed to work here. > > -- > Bruce Cran > The portsdb tool is not part of the base system if anyone is wondering, it comes from ports-mgmt/portupgrade. Not everyone is using portupgrade so if you post any instructions like this make sure you mention the extra tools involved and what they relate to. -Kimmo