From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 16 5: 9: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871CE1529A for ; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 05:09:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA82877; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 14:08:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Alexander Langer Cc: "Michael C. Vergallen" , gkshenaut@ucdavis.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux not FreeBSD? References: <199906151422.HAA05538@deal1.bogs.org> <19990615175138.A2300@cichlids.cichlids.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 16 Jun 1999 14:08:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: Alexander Langer's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:51:38 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexander Langer writes: > Additionally, writing pseudo-hacker-applications, as Winnuke or such > a thing, that exploits a OS, that is only used by "few" people just > won´t happen (almost), but will happen if many people use it (if you > know/understand, what I try to express). What you are trying to express is 'security through obscurity', which is a preposterous concept. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message