From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 23 2:19:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ewok.creative.net.au (ewok.creative.net.au [203.30.44.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50D8615A42 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 02:19:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adrian@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 14105 invoked by uid 1008); 23 Apr 1999 09:16:33 -0000 Message-ID: <19990423091633.14103.qmail@ewok.creative.net.au> From: adrian@freebsd.org To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: phk@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nice little kernel task for somebody In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:32:40 +0100." <9904221732.aa19138@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 17:16:33 +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Malone writes: >> Here's a thing I've missed a couple of times: I'd like to be >> able to see the limits for a process in /proc. > >I'd like to be able to open processes file discriptors too (so >you can still get files back if all the filsystem references to >it have gone, but a process still has it open). I might have a >go at doing both - if it isn't too Linuxesque. I don't know about that one, but the first one sounds easish. Since I've been messing around with procfs quite a bit lately, I'll spend some time later today poking around and produce a patch against -current . Adrian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message