From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sat Mar 10 08:43:33 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8238DF2D773; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A40B6A497; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 19F0A1CC5D; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:43:33 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Warner Losh Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330705 - head/sbin/mount Message-ID: <20180310084333.GC18340@FreeBSD.org> References: <201803092132.w29LW8QD030490@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201803092132.w29LW8QD030490@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:43:33 -0000 On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:32:08PM +0000, Warner Losh wrote: > New Revision: 330705 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330705 > > Log: > Remove decade's old whine about msdos vs msdosfs. > > Retain the compatibility silently though. Shouldn't it be the other way around? That is, after a decade of whining people would've updated their configs/scripts and old (deprecated) gimmick can now be removed? That's what usually implied by "deprecated", right? ./danfe > Modified: head/sbin/mount/mount.c > ... > @@ -589,11 +589,8 @@ mountfs(const char *vfstype, const char *spec, const c > optbuf = catopt(optbuf, "update"); > > /* Compatibility glue. */ > - if (strcmp(vfstype, "msdos") == 0) { > - warnx( > - "Using \"-t msdosfs\", since \"-t msdos\" is deprecated."); > + if (strcmp(vfstype, "msdos") == 0) > vfstype = "msdosfs"; > - }