From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 04:28:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D4216A41F for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@swaggi.com) Received: from swaggi.com (c-24-131-179-91.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.131.179.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7688D43D4C for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:28:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@swaggi.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=swaggi.com) by swaggi.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FMdyT-0004sv-MW for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:32:33 -0500 Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by swaggi.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2O4WXpV018778; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:32:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@swaggi.com) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:32:33 -0500 (EST) From: "Yuri Lukin" To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Cc: X-Originating-IP: 192.168.1.9 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.190 Message-Id: <1143174753.18776@swaggi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1143174753" Subject: RE: FreeBSD shutting down unexpectedly X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:28:17 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1143174753 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >I believe the 1st temp is MB, the 2nd CPU1, the third CPU2. One way to >figure out is to run something CPU intensive on only one CPU and watch >which temp rises. A huge gzip would do the trick. The MB temp >shouldn't change that much, but CPU should go up noticably. Good call, I gzipped a 500MB file and watched the second temp value rise. >I believe the monitoring chips are completely independent of SMP. The >monitoring chip has no clue whether the OS is using the CPU or not, it >just records its temp. I agree with you on that. >PS I hope mbmon has those voltages all wrong, as 3.27 and 7.93 are >nowhere near 5v or 12v! (There's also healthd in the ports, but my >(limited) experience is that it doesn't always get voltages right either). >From what I remember, when I looked in the BIOS I realized most of what mbmon was reporting was slightly off. Thanks to all for the help. -Yuri --bound1143174753--