From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 22 15:28:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37E01065670 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284B18FC08 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2522118bkc.13 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:28:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tV8SCVbZ4iTVh+Jk8egYR0MEigKtaAlc05gsTDK+wn0=; b=Pu7nJzzVcLs4ioinV3DDfCkXhEYbZtoA98YK4PxRiP4umEyeWPA+d0ufR2r1rKbqBE JexJ6jhIEB129Z0Thd4cTHAK7pa3bvH0UM+Lv2gc3EL1Ch6ef7DWHGmwdVbTtkIRbbjN Aud3X7IgM6c33/BTB8A27QcVLTeAuhsuzCvQbxMZpczsNNFo7dE2rGfPjrVve6Dp4tT5 9hgzdRwSzxnlkLXz0nR2IOIGFs4cNjhOWbcUgc2qZLVB9rCCn6vI69B1OWYSuN88foTf a73CLRAWnvQXxCAtB87p++YLx585k86WsEZkjg7UtCwJURc6QIdlbJcfTKz0mR8NCMNy GOHg== Received: by 10.205.122.73 with SMTP id gf9mr3148119bkc.96.1332430109919; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from green.tandem.local (132-186-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net. [95.132.186.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m3sm10623733bkz.0.2012.03.22.08.28.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F6B4519.7080209@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:28:25 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120315 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dweimer@dweimer.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 Snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:28:31 -0000 Dean E. Weimer wrote: > Has anyone been using Snapshots on UFS with journaled soft-updates enabled? > > I have a couple of new systems built after 9.0 came out, my backup > scripts take snapshots, and then mount them to backup the files, the > couple older servers that I upgraded from 8.2 to 9.0 from source are not > having any problems, a quick check shows their file systems aren't > running the new journaled Soft-Updates options. The new systems which > are, frequently hang up and become unresponsive when taking the snapshots. Known issue, don't use SUJ with snapshots on 9.0 for now. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.