From owner-freebsd-security Tue May 30 4: 7:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.polytechnic.edu.na (mail.polytechnic.edu.na [196.31.225.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD35B37B729 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 04:07:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tim@polytechnic.edu.na) Received: from [196.31.225.199] (helo=polytechnic.edu.na) by mail.polytechnic.edu.na with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #2) id 12wlkl-0000eP-00; Tue, 30 May 2000 11:08:15 -0200 Message-ID: <3933A0D8.5BDAA415@polytechnic.edu.na> Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 12:07:04 +0100 From: Tim Priebe Reply-To: tim@iafrica.com.na X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sen_ml@eccosys.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: QPOPPER: Remote gid mail exploit References: <20000530165232H.1001@eccosys.com> <20000530180805Y.1001@eccosys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org sen_ml@eccosys.com wrote: > p.s. i started to wonder about whether there were any decent > alternative pop daemons. anyone have any suggestions? i'd have > switched to the pop daemon that comes w/ qmail but i don't want to > convert to Maildir just yet. Check cucipop in ports, the only problem I have had with it is that it seems to consistantly report that it is going to send 9 more bytes than it actually does. It is also less resource intensive than qpopper. Tim. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message