From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 17:42:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10C016A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:42:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BD043D45 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:42:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBUHjg1V021594; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:45:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41D43DC7.8070502@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:41:27 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Christian R." References: <2rg6t0ll6th99497btiu13foetanfrn0gr@4ax.com> <41D368A4.1030408@freebsd.org> <8tg7t09g1f04igli4cplkob6ens98ckou0@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory handling problem with FreeBSD 5.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:42:48 -0000 Christian R. wrote: > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:02:16 +0100, you wrote: > > >>Would the AMD64 version of FreeBSD 5.3 be a better choice? > > > I have now installed the AMD64 version on the server. It has been > running stable now for some hours with alot of load and all the 6 GB > activated. It seems to be a problem with the i386 version og FreeBSD > 5.3. > i386 and amd64 have the exact same code for handling the needs of the amr driver. I'm a bit worried that one works for you while the other doesn't; I extensively tested the code on both platforms with 8GB of RAM. Scott