From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  8 12:58:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F78E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 12:58:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4076E43D45
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 12:58:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2005 12:58:20 -0000
Received: from pD955FBD7.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO lofi.dyndns.org)
	(217.85.251.215)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 08 Feb 2005 13:58:20 +0100
X-Authenticated: #443188
Received: from kiste.my.domain (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j18Cw9aY040032
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:58:09 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:58:03 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net>
	<200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
	<Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081336420.22612@ux11.ltcm.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081336420.22612@ux11.ltcm.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart5251640.dMrYo3gm8j";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200502081358.08045.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ULE status
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:58:23 -0000

--nextPart5251640.dMrYo3gm8j
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:38, Mipam wrote:

> Okay, so then the ULE sched is fairly stable then?
> But it's still not the default scheduler?

It will never become the default scheduler in 5.x again. 5.x went into -STA=
BLE=20
mode with 4BSD, and that's why the default will remain 4BSD.

> Is it safe to use right now=20
> under RELENG_5 or not?=20

As already said, you need to try *yourself*.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--nextPart5251640.dMrYo3gm8j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCCLdfXhc68WspdLARApc9AJ9TKelF8uBY82k8lVW/5oTPKG2dwACfblvQ
7jkUX0D6hMv74RaDUmRvYAI=
=aX+J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5251640.dMrYo3gm8j--