Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:58:03 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status Message-ID: <200502081358.08045.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081336420.22612@ux11.ltcm.net> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net> <200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081336420.22612@ux11.ltcm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart5251640.dMrYo3gm8j Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:38, Mipam wrote: > Okay, so then the ULE sched is fairly stable then? > But it's still not the default scheduler? It will never become the default scheduler in 5.x again. 5.x went into -STA= BLE=20 mode with 4BSD, and that's why the default will remain 4BSD. > Is it safe to use right now=20 > under RELENG_5 or not?=20 As already said, you need to try *yourself*. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart5251640.dMrYo3gm8j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCCLdfXhc68WspdLARApc9AJ9TKelF8uBY82k8lVW/5oTPKG2dwACfblvQ 7jkUX0D6hMv74RaDUmRvYAI= =aX+J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5251640.dMrYo3gm8j--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502081358.08045.michaelnottebrock>