Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Sep 1999 06:28:11 +0900
From:      "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>
To:        chuckr@mat.net
Cc:        andy@cgu.chel.su, asami@FreeBSD.org, cpiazza@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources
Message-ID:  <19990920062811F.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909191636590.3586-100000@picnic.mat.net>
References:  <19990920033633G.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909191636590.3586-100000@picnic.mat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, R. Imura wrote:
> 
> > >   And another question: Should we _strongly_ push X applications to use
> > > ${LOCALBASE} as ${PREFIX}, leave ${X11BASE} for only X11 system staff? 
> > > I prefer using ${X11BASE} as ${PREFIX} for _all_ X related applications, but..
> > > What your opinions?
> > 
> > I think so, too.
> 
> But you guys seem never to have looked at the code.  With the setup we
> have now, any port that uses imake to build itself must install itself
> under the x11 tree, and you don't get an option on that.

What port are you talking about?
KDE never uses imake.
Did you try to install KDE to ${X11BASE} or other prefix?
It's required a kind of trick.:-p)

---
R. Imura


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990920062811F.imura>