From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 14 12:38:28 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7FE16A46F
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tec@mega.net.br)
Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286A113C4D0
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tec@mega.net.br)
Received: from ap-h.matik.com.br (ap-h.matik.com.br [200.152.83.36])
	by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5ECcRZo088562;
	Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:38:28 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from tec@mega.net.br)
From: NOC Meganet <tec@mega.net.br>
Organization: Prowip Telecom Ltda
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:36:55 -0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <20070614084817.GA81087@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070614084817.GA81087@rot13.obsecurity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200706140936.55916.tec@mega.net.br>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3,
	clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on msrv.matik.com.br
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: smp@freebsd.org, performance@freebsd.org,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: BIND 9.4.1 performance on FreeBSD 6.2 vs. 7.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:38:28 -0000

On Thursday 14 June 2007 05:48:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 6.2 was used from CVS with libthr and the 4BSD scheduler (ULE 1.0 is
> broken in 6.x).

just curious what is broken because I use ULE on several servers perfectly. it 
seems to me that ULE is even faster on SMP when not having heavy load. 
Also "calcru went backwards" issues I do not get with ULE but sporadically on 
4BSD scheduler kernels, specially on dualcore cpus.



HM

--

Prowip Telecom Ltda
AS 22706







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br