From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 01:03:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B332E106564A for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ladr.torres@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4577B8FC14 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so319880ewy.13 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=EVDTzn5CDEaWVRoWaBVpBsMyW8Omlqto54PpBDIj6tM=; b=bgMpgrZC5H7VYNwCd9uxu9DXljjisLo4lHhWGkmFHVydTMkFqSNZ/WTnQ6jceoOH+0 he06CTOWrh6y/BSQHYzkOCxO9iRBfBFmOS+/s6yB5NSizKei9pZH0a4XlGShpZUmSqLm gDo9YAaYzaufCVqVL72T4tv4jag9EanJXjW+Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=tQLEnEijqqmTi1FbaKiYOHh5/cDO6xrc/1Fi3C01DTa68iHXFie2zLf32u1NSf8LD+ ZOHYD0zsZXcaXC1lwjRtbHSynmed4HANQbL9saYIo2RSH7NxVaHMDrH6ftMq1dbbJ+S+ RlUCBDilAscbVXi6Ef/6Jdx1WF9S1Niaoa+9I= Received: by 10.213.108.144 with SMTP id f16mr2409693ebp.136.1302051831103; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:03:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.27.196 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:03:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110405014825.GA3420@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <20110405014825.GA3420@michelle.cdnetworks.com> From: Adriel Torres Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:03:21 -0500 Message-ID: To: pyunyh@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revisit of older discussion on Intel em0 timeouts etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:03:52 -0000 > >> Would you give me more information on dc(4) link state changes? >> Can you see abnormal kernel message for dc(4)? >> I think I fixed a couple of dc(4) issues as well as bus_dma(9) bugs >> and I don't know how the link state change can happen under load >> unless it encountered watchdog timeouts or TX underun. It would be >> even better if you can try latest dc(4) in stable/8 on 8.2-RELEASE. >> >> Hello, unfortunately due to these timeouts, I had to switch the bind configuration to another BSD-based system temporarily. I would however, be happy to re-deploy the latest 8.2 Stable release and collect some more statistics or information. I will likely be able to get to this task in a couple of days or into the weekend and will update the list when I do so to see if we can't find some information. Regards, AdrieL