From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 15:05:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7318AA94F5 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@ns.kevlo.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (220-135-115-6.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.135.115.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.kevlo.org", Issuer "ns.kevlo.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3411190 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@ns.kevlo.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u1FF4DcD051339 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:04:14 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@ns.kevlo.org) Received: (from kevlo@localhost) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u1FF45qp051338; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:04:05 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:04:04 +0800 From: Kevin Lo To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: Kris , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Emmanuel Vadot Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the $9 C.H.I.P Message-ID: <20160215150404.GA51274@ns.kevlo.org> References: <56BBD0B0.7040407@thieprojects.ch> <56BBD6B9.3090703@interia.eu> <20160211104534.5c18d1d32b3b55fdc458f6a5@bidouilliste.com> <56BCD629.3040209@interia.eu> <20160215123438.GK75922@cicely7.cicely.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160215123438.GK75922@cicely7.cicely.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:05:05 -0000 On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 01:34:39PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 07:42:49PM +0100, Kris wrote: > > Yep, that's what I meant. As long as we distinguish Allwinner naming > > convention from what is inside we shall be fine (although Allwinner > > tries hard to confuse people... as if ARM had not done enough :) ) > > That being said I think support for Allwinner chips is worth being > > continued. They are cheap, quite robust, quite popular, and > > documentation is reasonably available (credits go to sunxi I must admit) > > This is the first time I hear someone saying that documentation for > Allwinner is available. > Any links to share or is this still under some kind of NDA? Some datasheets are available at https://github.com/allwinner-zh/documents > -- > B.Walter http://www.bwct.de > Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. Kevin