From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 11:11:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A35D16A4B3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4E443FBF for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:11:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4961365449; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:11:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 43806-06; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:11:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (unknown [81.3.72.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5596542F; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:11:22 +0100 (BST) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 52F6059; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:11:10 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:11:10 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: John Hay Message-ID: <20031007181109.GF73063@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <20031004190217.GA10149@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> <20031007180202.GA37174@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031007180202.GA37174@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umass panic when connecting camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:11:30 -0000 On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:02:02PM +0200, John Hay wrote: > Any comments from people a little more knowledgable in the umass/usb > area? I don't know about USB specifically, but I thought timeout() et al were to be deprecated in favour of callout*() ? BMS