Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:11:22 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] shipping kernels with default modules? Message-ID: <FE2990C0-1AB0-462F-9A74-8FAF826F33A3@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <118F0BE0-2F1A-4106-8050-F6FE1321E106@bsdimp.com> References: <BANLkTin2AwKRT7N6HWqBctJcT72_mR=Otg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinJP%2BmSiacOO03r8zAY_79ABDy_EQ@mail.gmail.com> <BDC0C06C-3152-49AF-A0F7-86A05AF14288@bsdimp.com> <B2BF0A26-1819-49C2-8331-3F00712AF523@lists.zabbadoz.net> <118F0BE0-2F1A-4106-8050-F6FE1321E106@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 12, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> Generally, the modules follow the global settings, since we've never tested building some network drivers with INET and some without, for example.
>>
>> What do you mean? I have been doing that for 2 or is it 3 years; you can even see which ones depend on it in sys/conf/makeLINT.mk these days ;)
>
> Sorry, I mean we do generally build ALL of them without INET or ALL of them with INET. While some people sometimes do things like load em with INET and say cxgb without INET in the same system, in general this hasn't been widely tested.
Oh, I see. I'd say "if at all unless by accident" in that case;)
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE2990C0-1AB0-462F-9A74-8FAF826F33A3>