From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Dec 4 11:52:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F99A40AC0 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jvp@lateapex.net) Received: from riddler.lateapex.net (riddler.lateapex.net [108.28.193.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "riddler.lateapex.net", Issuer "riddler.lateapex.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5835F1B3C for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jvp@lateapex.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (riddler.lateapex.net [IPv6:2001:470:e2f8:6969:0:0:0:217]) (authenticated bits=0) by riddler.lateapex.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id tB4BpRGS073964 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:51:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jvp@lateapex.net) X-Authentication-Warning: riddler.lateapex.net: Host riddler.lateapex.net [IPv6:2001:470:e2f8:6969:0:0:0:217] claimed to be [127.0.0.1] Subject: Re: Bridge Interfaces and ARPs References: <56604982.9010003@lateapex.net> <20151204070606.GA16904@babolo.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Jason Van Patten Message-ID: <56617E3E.2060405@lateapex.net> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:51:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151204070606.GA16904@babolo.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter: Spamilter DataSet=MTA-Peer; receiver=riddler.lateapex.net; sender-ip=2001:470:e2f8:6969::217; sender-helo=[127.0.0.1]; X-Milter: Spamilter DataSet=SessionId; receiver=riddler.lateapex.net; sessionid='8618af643c20d9458f391984adc1d230'; X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:52:52 -0000 On 12/4/15 2:06 AM, Aleksandr A Babaylov wrote: > > May be it is proxy arp from Verison. Fair assumption. They may be doing that to prevent one Verizon customer from talking directly to another without routing through them first, even though each customer is on the same broadcast domain. > sysctl net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1 This is actually brilliant and hysterical at the same time: using a broken network tech to fix a broken network. Ha! I'm rebuilding the router with newer hardware this weekend. I'll give your suggestion a try and report back to the mailing list post upgrade. Thanks for the idea! -- Jason Van Patten