From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 27 5: 9:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from osiris.ipform.ru (osiris.ipform.ru [212.158.165.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4956137B400 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 05:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from wp2 (localhost.ipform.ru [127.0.0.1]) by osiris.ipform.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0RD9M447026 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:09:28 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from matrix@ipform.ru) Message-ID: <007601c08862$60e3faa0$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> From: "Artem Koutchine" To: References: <20010127214418.A1197@plus.or.kr> Subject: Need comments on a message regarding FS benchmark Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:09:20 +0300 Organization: IP Form MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I have posted a message yesterday about Softupdates with different FS options benchmark and will be glad to see some comment or arguments about that, since it is a big perfomance issue. The subject was: SoftUpdates + fs otions find benchmarks are here The author: Artem Koutchine To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message