Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:27:01 +0200
From:      Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
To:        Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Lupe Christoph <lupe@lupe-christoph.de>
Subject:   Re: squidguard and default blacklists in plist
Message-ID:  <20090409122701.GE43377@megatron.madpilot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090409104417.GA945@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
References:  <20090409094545.GB43377@megatron.madpilot.net> <20090409104417.GA945@straylight.m.ringlet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 01:44:17PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:45:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm the maintainer of the www/squidguard port.
> > 
> > Some time ago I have been asked to try not make the port remove the
> > blacklists when, after installing the default ones, they were modified
> > by the user.
> [snip]
> > I have few options at this point:
> 
> The usual approach is to install them as .dist or .sample or something
> like that, copy them with their real names, and only remove the "real"
> ones if they are the same as the sample ones.  This involes several
> steps:
[...]

I see, but, my mistake, I did not explain an important detail of
the prblem: the sample files are really a whole hierarchy with files
being compiled to bdb files in it. Should I install the whole
hierarchy with a .sample name and work as usuale with the files
inside?

Is this acceptable? I understood it was not.

-- 
Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090409122701.GE43377>