Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:30:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 170351] setrlimit(2): 64-bit children of 32-bit processes cannot have an unlimited rlimit Message-ID: <bug-170351-227-K4tgBdTws9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-170351-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-170351-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D170351 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People CC| |mqiao@juniper.net Summary|[kernel] amd64: 64-bit |setrlimit(2): 64-bit |process can't always get |children of 32-bit |unlimited rlimit |processes cannot have an | |unlimited rlimit Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(mqiao@ | |juniper.net) Assignee|amd64@FreeBSD.org |bugs@FreeBSD.org Component|amd64 |kern Keywords|patch |needs-patch, needs-qa Hardware|Any |amd64 --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- ^Triage: Update issue to reflect latest (2012) state. - Clarify summary to reflect problem as reported - Reporter aimed to submit an updated patch (needs-patch) - kib@ suggested two approaches (one a workaround, one a non trivial change= for a minor case) Request feedback from (hopefully still available reporter) @Konstantin If your second non-trivial code change is unlikely to be accept= ed, we also have the option of closing Not Accepted based on what we have so fa= r (a not accepted initial patch) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-170351-227-K4tgBdTws9>