Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:53:44 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Xavier Beaudouin <kiwi@oav.net> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netra T1 105 hme0 woes ? Message-ID: <20041026235344.Q12117@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <8CAB39A1-268D-11D9-B00B-000A958871B8@oav.net>; from kiwi@oav.net on Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:55:37PM %2B0200 References: <72BED2C2-2429-11D9-B165-000A958871B8@oav.net> <20041025013138.B20538@newtrinity.zeist.de> <8CAB39A1-268D-11D9-B00B-000A958871B8@oav.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:55:37PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > Hello Marius, > > > I don't think that Solaris disbales the internal PHY in this case. > > The problem is some strangeness that when the unused PHY of the first > > HME chip (either ukphy0 or ukphy1) is isolated from the MII bus the > > whole bus wedges. > > Could you give the patch at: > > http://alchemy.franken.de/~marius/hme_luphy.diff > > a try? Please start with an empty kernel build directory. > > Works like a charm and solved all my problems :) > Thank you very much for testing! > > Note I use FreeBSD 5.3-RC1... does this patch will be added to > 5.3-RELEASE ? > No, certainly not, sorry. As it's no real showstopper on these machines (simply leave it in autonegotiation mode ...) it's too late in the release-cycle for such a change. Before committing to -current I also want to give it some more thougths and test it with some other Sun machines and cards also using a LU6612 PHY. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041026235344.Q12117>