From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 21 02:49:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F26106564A; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCAE8FC0C; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so2713521qyk.13 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:48:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D8qHflPHR8coIAyLdU2YG0z4/GVv/THtAGkyDsOZ+vs=; b=BW3DeAyvxMOtkySeWT60R6ZRKLZOzI/7JlYQWblmxWsQiYZxLoOScdT7FnUjzNN5Jp kwOAWLT4SCCTsba1wZys6/HFx2zu+nxP/mwswaq8glzeV5AZ/tnfIgYpVUCX4GlBIwJ9 uKWIE6DalvYZDbGA4HEW6lRkPYAkCsW1G/o4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=A3/BZvLS/m6oTwfyn5vgj6nao2vCcGJ8pTrFEQeYafzZQm+hBJ58V7hagobnll3k6s 8ULf/MXcaW8PRjvCuRhOLB+NA0rZDBUl/ux8VXC5Synyy292k/a1MZK0shaFki01WMzV f3kmr9JldSC2GuPbyD1N1z12DD4yENSSXCJOc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.18.11 with SMTP id u11mr5114423qaa.394.1303354137915; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.72 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:48:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DAEAE1B.70207@FreeBSD.org> <20110420203754.GM85668@acme.spoerlein.net> <4DAF46F8.9040004@FreeBSD.org> <4DAF5FBA.8080304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:48:57 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Alexander Motin , Doug Barton , FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:49:00 -0000 On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 04/20/2011 15:18, Scott Long wrote: >> >>> I agree with what Alexander is saying, but I'd like to take it a step >>> further. We should all be using [...] mount-by-label >>> >> >> +1 >> >> When I first saw this on linux my gut reaction was "ewwww, different." But >> now that I've worked with it a bit, I really like it. Doing this by default >> in 9.0 would be a really useful step forward, and would allow greater >> innovation down the road. >> >> Is there a handy tutorial somewhere for making this change in FreeBSD? Or >> is it even possible to do in a rational way? >> > > Not sure I understand the question. I have a little article called FreeBSD > Labeled Filesystems: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html > > It uses filesystem labels instead of device labels (except for swap). The > differences are the utility used to create the labels and where the labels > show up in /dev. > _______________________________________________ > > These steps are used AFTER installations of the FreeBSD . To have them selectable DURING installation is a much more desired structure . Also thank you very much for your articles . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk