From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  9 08:48:15 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A38716A4BF; Tue,  9 Sep 2003 08:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4AB3243FBF; Tue,  9 Sep 2003 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru)
Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19wkmB-000265-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 22:51:31 +0700
Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26])
	by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19wkm7-00022x-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 22:51:27 +0700
Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h89Fnovt028249;
	Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:49:50 +0700 (NOVST)
	(envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru)
Received: (from danfe@localhost)
	by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h89FnnrO028243;
	Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:49:49 +0700 (NOVST)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:49:49 +0700
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20030909154949.GA26883@regency.nsu.ru>
References: <20030905.183837.116096286.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10309060440130.18871-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
	<20030909153039.GA942@rot13.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030909153039.GA942@rot13.obsecurity.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Envelope-To: kris@obsecurity.org,
 deischen@freebsd.org,
 DougB@freebsd.org,
 imp@bsdimp.com,
 freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
cc: deischen@freebsd.org
cc: DougB@freebsd.org
cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RFC: NO_FOO knobs in make.conf
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:48:15 -0000

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:30:40AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:42:12AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > 
> > > In message: <20030905140628.H90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz>
> > >             Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> writes:
> > > : Once we get general consensus (not universal agreement :) on this, I'll
> > > : take responsibility for marshaling the aforementioned volunteer
> > > : resources.
> > > 
> > > I'd just do it.  we've already talked this to death.  Lots of people
> > > want it, some don't.  Every time we talk about it, that's the
> > > outcome.  Let's just do it and get on with our lives.
> > 
> > Or change all the NO*, NO_* to WANT_* and default them to yes.

WANT_FOO is bpm's internally used vars; practice of using names like
these should be avoided, FWIW.

./danfe