From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 5 18:01:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F366016A41C; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8C543D49; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j65I1uAM008357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:01:56 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j65I1tKS005814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:01:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j65I1tIL005813; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:01:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:01:54 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Maksim Yevmenkin Message-ID: <20050705180154.GA5440@cell.sick.ru> References: <200507051735.j65HZK06019006@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netgraph netgraph.h ng_base.c ng_socket.c ng_socketvar.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:01:59 -0000 On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:54:18AM -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: M> in your opinion, is this likely to affect other parts of netgraph? M> (i.e. netgraph atm, netgraph bluetooth). The only affect on other nodes is that ng_item grows. I don't see any big performance affect now. If there would be found any, then I will rethink size of ng_item later. It can affect userland code. But only if there are some errors in code. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE