Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 06:33:43 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license? Message-ID: <5B3AB657.6020602@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <79be1e72-4bf6-6271-f795-8dc3b1b888ce@rawbw.com> References: <0afd6f84-146a-d555-d759-366686259448@rawbw.com> <5B3AB11D.5070601@grosbein.net> <79be1e72-4bf6-6271-f795-8dc3b1b888ce@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
03.07.2018 6:17, Yuri wrote: >> It does. See mail/dcc-dccd for example. > But it doesn't ask to "agree" during 'pkg install dcc-dccd'. Yes. Meantime, you have several choices: 1) Mark the port NO_PACKAGE and/or no-pkg-mirror to force users use a port that 1a) builds software from source, or 1b) installs pre-build binaries bundled with distfiles (just like cvsup binary port did earlier); 2) Prepare and submit a patch for pkg itself to support this feature. It should be not hard to do.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B3AB657.6020602>