From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 24 15:56:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA22791 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA22786 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA04750; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:56:08 -0700 (MST) From: Don Yuniskis Message-Id: <199607242256.PAA04750@seagull.rtd.com> Subject: Re: SPAM ( was Re: Chancellor Group) To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:56:08 -0700 (MST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, chag@moneyworld.com In-Reply-To: <199607242230.QAA02701@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Jul 24, 96 04:30:07 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > My suggestion is to add this person to *ALL* our mailing lists. I think > we generate enough traffic to make a dent in is network, and given that > he added our address to his list I htink adding him to our lists is only > appropriate. > > Turn-about *IS* fair play! Sh*t! Sometimes the obvious solutions just pass us by! :> > (If that's not acceptable, then a couple of 'well-connected' individuals could > forward all freebsd related material to him, thus accomplishing the same > task) (though I prefered my idea of mailing him a uuencoded kernel -- actually, probably should `split` it into tiny chunks so it looks more like real mail -- for every incoming message received... from *anyone*! :>) Apologies... this is my last post to -hackers as this thread rightfully belongs on chat... <:-)