From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 17:30:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F4916A417 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BD413C45D for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so1581537ugf for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hH83SBFWYVZTrzDOdxjImBAWbO6Z4KLZnxHmkMbWx50=; b=NORctw/giCrHEdK9E+dFl6muocoi7P8h3tTwiV2Ki0GBVwt4VZymLFjo76vkpNPRJWUSNAie7He68yy0QS8WPviWG1WG28OXYMWeqY1wELZ863ppLRGCsPv9TrKHWW7tDqmPLEOg5sUcgGidgc6rWcmcptOy6BQSzXUedw6B8x4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=d6rujZTRo25ConaNjRnb8x7ZHrIoAGtPTLK1hGoXZbVd1BjPtjnxBn6NZY3tuud0blm/xnP3bUu3OwJuP+ta3fDNidA4qWTLrg7hUSlfLHMHJQDxfBd8FfCw2v5luw6zfoCNuGset3XuxyZjoHMj+4DWmkDO8Pq9JoPs0mm7gyc= Received: by 10.67.28.4 with SMTP id f4mr3854231ugj.1190914220759; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.20.1 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0709271030k24892099ra3409ce6f5f7020f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:30:20 +0100 From: Chris To: pyunyh@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20070927065155.GE3692@cdnetworks.co.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3aaaa3a0709231657r3264c873ife71800731608b03@mail.gmail.com> <20070924020116.GA36909@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <3aaaa3a0709240844j2603a050nd09bb5482a0f3c21@mail.gmail.com> <20070927065155.GE3692@cdnetworks.co.kr> Cc: FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:30:22 -0000 On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > > > options=8 > > > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast x.x.x.x > > > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.x.x.x > > > > ether x > > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) > > > > status: active > > > > > > > > 1 - is there a man page for nfe anywhere? > > > > > > Closest thing I can find would be the manpage from -CURRENT's nfe(4), > > > which is supposedly the same code. > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=nfe&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7-current&format=html > > > > > > > 2 - does it support hardware checksum I remember reading it does but > > > > from ifconfig output it appears to not be in use so if it does support > > > > it how do I enable it? > > > > > > It does support it, but I don't know the circumstances surrounding when > > > it gets enabled. That is to say, it's known that some versions of the > > > chip (and/or associated PHY) have bugs, so possibly hardware checksum > > > offloading is known to be broken on the system you're on. Taken from my > > > 7-CURRENT box at home (Asus A8N-E, nForce 4-based): > > > > > > nfe0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > > options=10b > > > ether 00:15:f2:17:30:e9 > > > inet 192.168.1.51 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > > > media: Ethernet 1000baseTX > > > status: active > > > > > > I do not explicitly specify rxcsum or txcsum in my rc.conf ifconfig > > > line. > > > > > > > 3 - same with TOS? > > > > > > TOS (type-of-service) or TSO? If TSO, see above ifconfig. > > > > > > > 4 - how do I enable jumbo frames if it supports it? > > > > > > You should take a bit more itme to read the webpage you obtained the > > > driver from. I see these on the page: > > > > > > 2007/01/06 Added jumbo frame support. [...] Fixed a bug to handle > > > Tx/Rx checksum offload settings with ifconfig. > > > 2006/08/11 Added support for jumbo frame capability. > > > > > > yongari@ (Pyun YongHyeon) should be able to provide additional help > > > with both. > > > > > > > 5 - is it safe to use with zero copy sockets? > > > > > > No idea. > > > > > > > 6 - I currently have both net.isr.direct and mpsafenet disabled is > > > > this driver safe to use on them? > > > > > > No idea. > > > > > > -- > > > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | > > > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > > > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > > > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > > > > > > > > > Thanks yes I meant TSO sorry, I would guess with the checksum either > > the 6.x driver is older and not fully implemented yet, the 6.x driver > > does need more patches for certian chipsets so would indicate its > > older then the CURRENT driver. Or as you said my chipset is known to > > be unstable with the hardware checksums. > > > > See the other mail I've posted. > > > The card is more stable when using nve driver no crashes still but the > > performance is around the same maxing out at around 200mbit. I was > > expecting nearer 400-500mbit. > > > > e1000phy0: on miibus0 > > > > There had been issues nfe(4) with 88E1116/88E1149 PHYs but your issue > seems to be different one. How about manually set media configuration? > For example, "ifconfig nfe0 media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" > > > Is the line from dmesg, I believe in CURRENT mpsafe is always on > > regardless so if you have no problems then its a good sign and I will > > reenable mpsafe networking (default). > > > > Thanks really appreciated. > > > > Chris > -- > Regards, > Pyun YongHyeon > I typod I meant to say nve was unstable and nfe has been rock solid so great work with the driver. I enabled mpsafe now and still no problems and its gave me a little more performance as well, a shame my nic has no hardware features (unusual for a gigabit nic) but overall glad its at least stable. Chris