From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 6 07:20:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8A510656C1 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E17E8FC08 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o867KJEH046493 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:20:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o867KJWs046492; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:20:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:20:19 GMT Message-Id: <201009060720.o867KJWs046492@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:13:27 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/150170: SIG_ATOMIC_MIN/SIG_ATOMIC_MAX 32-bit when sig_atomic_t is 64-bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:20:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/150170; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/150170: SIG_ATOMIC_MIN/SIG_ATOMIC_MAX 32-bit when sig_atomic_t is 64-bit Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 02:16:31 -0500 ----- Forwarded message from John Baldwin ----- From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Cc: bde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/150170: SIG_ATOMIC_MIN/SIG_ATOMIC_MAX 32-bit when sig_atomic_t is 64-bit > 32-bit vs 64-bit seems to be reversed here... Yes, but we should still fix this one way or another. I was surprised recently when I found that sig_atomic_t was long on amd64. Perhaps Bruce (cc'd) knows which way it should be fixed? -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ----- End forwarded message -----