From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 00:09:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CFE1065677 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitche@kitchetech.com) Received: from rt06.vds2000.com (s6.n225.vds2000.com [64.6.225.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EA18FC15 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitche@kitchetech.com) Received: from pool-72-65-6-48.bflony.east.verizon.net ([72.65.6.48]:64791 helo=localhost) by rt06.vds2000.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1K4OsC-0003ND-7k; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:28:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:36:24 -0400 From: Matthew Donovan To: Nikolaj Thygesen Message-ID: <20080605233624.GA3112@njord.Belkin> References: <48486F30.1000603@diamondbox.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48486F30.1000603@diamondbox.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rt06.vds2000.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - kitchetech.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Commiting new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:09:37 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I hope this is the right list to ask this question. I recently=20 > commited a new port, and received two messages from "ports." The first=20 > one noted that a person had assigned the port to himself, and the second= =20 > mail simply stated that the PR went from "open" to "closed" due to=20 > "feedback timeout." I reckon this means the port was rejected, but have= =20 > no clue for what reason. Was I supposed to supply any kind of feedback=20 > somewhere?? >=20 >=20 > br - Nikolaj >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I have put up ports that are new and have not heard anything myself but it = sounds like they were waiting for someone to give feedback on your port.=20 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhIeHgACgkQCyI5DJQdxQ8x8ACfU3svSXBi+mV441VLOo3S4LXZ 8IwAnAi2wp0wXEhasGOoGHCNNn1N+XbT =kXZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--