From owner-freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Tue Jun 28 19:43:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84282B8603A for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jau789@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4B12899; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jau789@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f126so153498217wma.1; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:43:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2egqEgx2fEzpazX8o6cA4VVe/sWuNDq34ObgFb+5g18=; b=Rv9AAsgFjp4GP7kxYX8iZaYugNXCLY1mKm7yhA1aW1FAeh1MqFRH/8cR4eDxYyHeGs uuSJunIsfJzr76gsX7+FHwGNt4xEEqKMqS3cl1tUnm9aUM2PeZJH91h/WF9cdAWixnse CMdfd1QB9FX0ECVmR1PAunU772LPdgmOpVctkKxOrWi9YuZZUGO5nDFEgqM0t+GAYe9B bruzLDqn2kD1EtDxDdjsn4m6JJqRO0q7F25Z+I39pBR9WSS/Rq5U+ahz70itVvd2nXuk gA3IgiYTy4I8fYAiqHgmchSrlvwTTKJuEGvBYSFY6bTBhZwJO+qoyqEQgixGA+sIOE/j xNeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2egqEgx2fEzpazX8o6cA4VVe/sWuNDq34ObgFb+5g18=; b=AG1rXtFclYUlfmuz2glZiz54X6GUMCsh+EofNR7aY4fxRKMhEgfQ+cXQMJao3ML3EA fhi0mh/R+nHHXSxv5P6GwFZyzWg07k4kOdAb9J/blBrEWzcNrM3AAoREVfbqFWbYWDmS KDDB2uvTerMja2n+nMk+MIrGRAbCljqPH5fItZxjY3TYImhuW2UOyO+/3icw8N/Dz75K 7EjwCLxvIyNa6rcMEm0FZL4guz8Zoy9plGhQCzxTYpS0EhnWj4SOvhpwZli7SulIxDUB 3kmmLKHkbFB/Cn5Sh096ctGp3S+parMV3InCwF2ap8ThzIpo31OW0CprPZ15VSL+rQga Ji+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK8jcunC7JaDgO5w8Ebi2Kh4RaUhknPwkMw6gvvqAmd7PEovKaEkju4T+Sc1Ji2Cw== X-Received: by 10.194.153.98 with SMTP id vf2mr4632564wjb.72.1467143027523; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.193] (xdsl-205-1.nblnetworks.fi. [83.145.205.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g195sm437150wme.23.2016.06.28.12.43.46 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Compiler dependent problems again on ppc64 From: Jukka Ukkonen X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13F69) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:43:40 +0300 Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML , Bryan Drewery Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <993E1F7C-F18B-42A7-BA08-9A815B1A7CD3@gmail.com> References: <3de3c40b-4edc-327e-f262-26230c7a3b12@gmail.com> To: Justin Hibbits X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:43:49 -0000 The last version I tried was current pulled from svn today only a few hours ago. I guess around 16:00 GMT today is the best estimate I can give right now. The system on which I did the test is already powered down. I can check the exact svn release number tomorrow, though. The latest successful rebuild I have done was on the 19th. After that I tried a new rebuild only yesterday morning, and then it suddenly failed. --jau > On 28 Jun 2016, at 21:14, Justin Hibbits wrote: >=20 >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jukka A. Ukkonen wro= te: >>=20 >> Hello all, >>=20 >> It seems there is yet another compiler dependent problem on >> ppc64. Most likely the same problem applies to all platforms >> using the old gcc as the default compiler. >> When trying to build gnu/lib/libstdc++ the compiler seems to >> get the option -std=3Dc++11. The gcc complains about this and >> the build gets invariably broken at that point. This has now >> been going on for two days or so. This makes me believe nobody >> is actively running rebuilds of the latest current on any gcc >> based platform. >>=20 >> --jau >=20 > Which revision are you using? This should've been fixed a couple > weeks ago. Adding Bryan Drewery, who made the fix. >=20 > - Justin