From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 19:21:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B08ACA9 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail-n.franken.de", Issuer "Thawte DV SSL CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2AB4E15 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (p54818DD9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.141.217]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237BC1C104355; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:21:01 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi stability improved From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:20:58 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <68465952-447A-4509-B97C-7C1BAE1FFF5D@freebsd.org> References: To: Sevan / Venture37 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: freebsd-arm X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:21:06 -0000 > On 17 Jan 2015, at 19:46, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > > On 14 January 2015 at 21:46, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I just wanted you let you know that FreeBSD head on the Raspberry Pi >> is much more stable now. I've tested r277054 and was able to >> portsnap fetch and extract and build the ports for git/subversion/vim >> without any problems using a Raspberry Pi B with an SD card. >> It took a day or two... >> All tests I did before where less stable. Most of the times the machine >> crashed when doing the portsnap stuff. > > > Hi Michael, > That's really cool, I look forward to trying new snapshots, by the > way, what sorts of issues needed to be resolved to stablise it? I'm not sure what you are asking... It is now very stable (it didn't crash at all up to now). I guess https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277038 made a difference... Best regards Michael > > > Sevan / Venture37 >