Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:13:21 -0600 From: freebsd-lists-erik@erikosterholm.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to upgrade packages on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120131001321.GA38503@limerick.barragry.com> In-Reply-To: <20120130222828.GA1814@hemlock.hydra> References: <CAGy-%2Bi-6GLfoUuhUExjnVEKhM00TuUimhKuhboLkjBeXNk9hFg@mail.gmail.com> <20120130215826.140fa9df@mpw> <CAGy-%2Bi9pYgB3VjG8KQg98Bfr5Ax2BOLOnuqrzOe_P5juDe%2BVjw@mail.gmail.com> <20120130222828.GA1814@hemlock.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:28:28PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > You talk a lot about how easy it is to maintain a binary package system. > I would like you to convince me that it is easy, keeping in mind that it > should remain compatible with the ports system. I am willing to be > convinced. > > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Oh come on, guys. David is the same person who said that FreeBSD was poorly documented. http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-questions/2011-12/msg00684.html I really hate throwing around the 'T' word, but I'm starting to wonder. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt a bit longer. David, it's increasingly clear that FreeBSD is not going to fit your needs. If, for some reason, you are interested in the FreeBSD kernel, but binary packages, consider GNU/kFreeBSD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120131001321.GA38503>