From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 10 08:23:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA18212 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 08:23:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA18206 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 08:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id LAA13456; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 11:23:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 11:23:44 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Jean-Marc Zucconi cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: html files [Re: texinfo changes ready] In-Reply-To: <9701101549.AA05998@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote: > I think we could do something similar for the ports installing their > own html documentation. The html documentation is currently installed > in more or less random locations and is not always apparent. What > about forcing the ports to install their html files in > /usr/local/share/html/PACKAGENAME/* and use a small utility to > maintain /usr/local/share/html/INDEX.html? I agree, but would lobby for /usr/local/share/doc/html rather than /usr/local/share/html. If each package directory contains an index.html file, it is a simple matter to automagically collect the elements to build a master index.html. -john