Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:41:07 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ??? Message-ID: <20060121214106.GL63244@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20060121210956.GU25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <2209162.1137777933811.JavaMail.root@vms075.mailsrvcs.net> <20060120193741.GC39932@xor.obsecurity.org> <43D15C19.314EC346@verizon.net> <20060120222629.GA43985@xor.obsecurity.org> <43D19011.D15F8462@verizon.net> <20060121015311.GA46753@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060121160739.GH63244@over-yonder.net> <20060121202321.GA83848@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060121203057.GK63244@over-yonder.net> <20060121210956.GU25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:09:56AM +1100 I heard the voice of Peter Jeremy, and lo! it spake thus: > > Given that a port's dependency tree can depend on the options it is > invoked with, it would be nicer if the dependency tree was generated > dynamically, rather than pulled out of the latest INDEX file. I'm pretty sure it _is_, since portupgrade finds things related to OPTIONS and such for me, and I don't blow multiple hours on INDEX builds. I'm pretty sure it uses all-depends-list (or one of its siblings). -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060121214106.GL63244>