From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 21:41:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE8616A41F for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:41:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [64.39.75.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B982443D4C for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED99AAD; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:41:07 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 196DC61C21; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:41:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:41:07 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20060121214106.GL63244@over-yonder.net> References: <2209162.1137777933811.JavaMail.root@vms075.mailsrvcs.net> <20060120193741.GC39932@xor.obsecurity.org> <43D15C19.314EC346@verizon.net> <20060120222629.GA43985@xor.obsecurity.org> <43D19011.D15F8462@verizon.net> <20060121015311.GA46753@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060121160739.GH63244@over-yonder.net> <20060121202321.GA83848@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060121203057.GK63244@over-yonder.net> <20060121210956.GU25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060121210956.GU25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-fullermd.2 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:41:09 -0000 On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:09:56AM +1100 I heard the voice of Peter Jeremy, and lo! it spake thus: > > Given that a port's dependency tree can depend on the options it is > invoked with, it would be nicer if the dependency tree was generated > dynamically, rather than pulled out of the latest INDEX file. I'm pretty sure it _is_, since portupgrade finds things related to OPTIONS and such for me, and I don't blow multiple hours on INDEX builds. I'm pretty sure it uses all-depends-list (or one of its siblings). -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.