Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:56:28 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: leak of the vnodes
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004061011470.24982@sci.felk.cvut.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20100405185924.GS2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004021934550.15800@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20100402190239.GL2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004022337010.16354@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004030915440.17349@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20100403165238.GO2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004032106480.18491@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20100403171945.GQ2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004032318210.18783@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20100403210829.GW2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004052223210.23732@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20100405185924.GS2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I would expect that sum of mnt_nvnodelistsize should be vfs.numvnodes.
>> The sum is at about 3400, but the vfs.numvnodes is at about 38000.
>> Is my expectation correct ?
> Not quite, reclaimed vnode is removed from mp list.

Are they in some other list ?

> Can you check
> that vmstat -z | grep VNODE output coincides with sysctl vfs.numvnodes ?

I would say yes:

kern.maxvnodes: 31000
kern.minvnodes: 2000
vfs.freevnodes: 21
vfs.wantfreevnodes: 2000
vfs.numvnodes: 31011
debug.vnlru_nowhere: 261

ITEM                     SIZE     LIMIT      USED      FREE  REQUESTS  FAILURES
VNODE:                    480,        0,    30999,      777,   248903,        0
VNODEPOLL:                112,        0,       80,       85,       80,        0

But still:

0xffffff0003939be0 /dev/ad0s2a on / (ufs)
 	mnt_nvnodelistsize = 570

0xffffff000393a000 devfs on /dev (devfs)
 	mnt_nvnodelistsize = 41

0xffffff0003939000 /dev/ad0s2d on /opt/sid/build (ufs)
 	mnt_nvnodelistsize = 52

There is 30000 vnodes somewhere.

> Also, can you unmount linprocfs before the test and see whether it
> leaks as before ?
> Another thing to try is set sysctl debug.disablefullpath to 1.

Done both before this test, still "hangs/leaks":

vfs.cache.numfullpathfound: 29075
vfs.cache.numfullpathfail4: 0
vfs.cache.numfullpathfail2: 0
vfs.cache.numfullpathfail1: 0
vfs.cache.numfullpathcalls: 29075
debug.disablefullpath: 1

Petr




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.62.1004061011470.24982>