From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Feb 20 19:22:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F6BF234E6 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A9668582 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4209822F38 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w1KJMp5n054932 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:22:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w1KJMpuV054931 for freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:22:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198385] syslogd seems to leak memory under certain circumstances Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:22:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: dab@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:22:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D198385 David Bright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dab@freebsd.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #2 from David Bright --- Sreeram, please let me know if you are still interested in pursuing a fix to this bug. I can help you with that if so. One change I would suggest in your proposed patch is to exchange the order = of the F_FILE and F_FORW cases so that the clean up applicable to F_FORW is not also done for the F_FILE case. Granted, the "if (f->f_un.f_forw.f_addr)" te= st would (should) fail in the F_FILE case, but it would still be cleaner not = to attempt it at all. Also, it would be very helpful if you could rebase your patch on the current HEAD branch, which is where it would first be integrat= ed into the FreeBSD code base. If you do not want to pursue this fix, I will do so myself, based on the information you have provided so far. Thank you. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=