From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 13 12:33:14 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D814116A403
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from max@love2party.net)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de
	[212.227.126.174])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6699F13C45D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from max@love2party.net)
Received: from [88.66.11.22] (helo=amd64.laiers.local)
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0ML2xA-1HR6Bk3A0m-000211; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:33:13 +0100
From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Organization: FreeBSD
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:33:01 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <20070313121106.GA96293@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20070313121106.GA96293@nagual.pp.ru>
X-Face: ,,8R(x[kmU]tKN@>gtH1yQE4aslGd<hB5S>u+2];
	R]*pL,U>^H?)gW@49@wdJ`H<=?utf-8?q?=25=7D*=5FBD=0A=09U=5For=3D=5CmOZf764=26nYj=3DJYbR1PW0ud?=>|!~,,CPC.1-D$FG@0h3#'5"k{V]a~.<=?utf-8?q?mZ=7D44=23Se=7Em=0A=09Fe=7E=5C=5DX5B=5D=5Fxj?=(ykz9QKMw_l0C2AQ]}Ym8)fU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1427497.Emh7oR0LCp";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200703131333.11692.max@love2party.net>
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/yowmm+uYP0i9qRRiMh8FmT4bdTZpE0OEz3xg
	0SGuday1WC1j9QbPny62iz8cM7fipc/C1yCb/St+s14mg/CgAV
	vkXw5l0OakG3P+Hg35AGg==
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Bad gcc -O optimization cause core dump. What to do?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:33:14 -0000

--nextPart1427497.Emh7oR0LCp
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 13 March 2007 13:11, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> Copy the segment below to the file a.c
> ---------------------- cut me here ---------------------
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> main() {
> printf("%s\n", NULL);
> }
> ---------------------- cut me here ---------------------
> Compile first as
> cc a.c
> ./a.out
> got
> (null)
> Then compile as
> cc -O a.c
> ./a.out
> got core dump.
=2E..
> It calls "puts(NULL)" with core dump.
> It means "printf("%s\n", NULL)" is overoptimized.
> BTW, things like "printf("1%s\n", NULL)" are not overoptimized.
> Any ideas? Is it right or needs to be fixed?

See: http://www.ciselant.de/projects/gcc_printf/gcc_printf.html 3.1

=2D-=20
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

--nextPart1427497.Emh7oR0LCp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBF9poHXyyEoT62BG0RAqPwAJ9OFBUGwQqZcagQU4Aji8kHy2F6wQCcCHRz
gOPehzSH5fw+bsYLAsmrS7A=
=hKZl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1427497.Emh7oR0LCp--