Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 14:11:59 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: While we're on the subject... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970206140957.3886B-100000@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <855220778.617480@haywire.DIALix.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Feb 1997, Peter Wemm wrote: > I've been running with a version of it for what seems like 6 months now, but > my version was tied in with fixes to the P_SUGID flag rather than create > a new flag. As I already say in previous reply, I don't understand how it can be tied to P_SUGID flag. P_SUGID is set _after_ the code issue set*id() call and P_SUGIDEXEC is set immediately after suid binary launched even it not call set*id(). -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970206140957.3886B-100000>