From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Sat Feb 24 07:44:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A25F1FC9A for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823957356D for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3C4E8F1FC91; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2522FF1FC90 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3D8773566 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71CC7C74 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:43:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w1O7hxuL095246 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:43:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w1O7hxKt095244 for gnome@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:43:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226122] editors/focuswriter: Update to 1.6.10 Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:43:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name keywords cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:44:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226122 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(gnome@ | |FreeBSD.org) Keywords| |needs-qa CC| |gnome@FreeBSD.org, | |kwm@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #17 from Kubilay Kocak --- Request portmgr (& gnome team) advice/decision on: - INSTALL_ICONS being allowed by individual ports, without (or until) curre= nt framework standardisation (I am not aware of the current state) - In what manner INSTALL_ICONS should be used, and what considerations shou= ld be made (for example, with regard to conditional/OPTION'al inclusion). Note: The above questions are separate to the question of 'to what extent changes should be combined or separated into distinct issues (patches)' Whi= le there is a defacto lean towards isolated changes, the reality is it is not a consistently (if at all) enforced standard, nor has objective or documented measures. Participants are reminded that issue tracker content/comments become perman= ent and public record, and should reflect the very best of peoples abilities to remain objective, factual and considerate. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=