From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 25 19:31:47 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFCB16A41F
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:31:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481B843D45
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:31:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9PJVi8M080977
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:31:45 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
	by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9PJViZh080976;
	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:31:44 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to
	glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:31:44 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20051025193144.GU41520@cell.sick.ru>
References: <025401c5d953$47004480$821cfa9e@mics.msu.su>
	<20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Cc: Mike G <mike@v.gz.ru>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: uart and puc attach conflict
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:31:48 -0000

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:43:37PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
K> > I have a problem with  multi-port card based on Nm9845 chip.
K> > It's a card with 4 com-ports.
K> > It perfectly works with puc(4) and sio(4) drivers if they compiled into 
K> > kernel.
K> > or with puc(4) and uart(4) drivers if they loaded manualy.
K> > But if puc(4) and uart(4) are compiled into kernel or loaded from
K> > loader.conf  - problem appears.
K> 
K> Isn't puc superceded by uart?  Why do you need both?

Shouldn't uarts attach on puc? This is what I have in 5.4-STABLE
system:

puc0: <Cronyx Omega2-PCI> mem 0xea202000-0xea202fff irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0
uart0: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart1: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart2: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart3: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart4: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart5: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart6: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
uart7: <16750 or compatible> on puc0

Should it be other way in 6.0 and HEAD?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE