From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Apr 28 13:27:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA8B37B422 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 13:27:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f3SKRdR04146; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:27:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:27:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" To: Dima Dorfman Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: uprintf.9 In-Reply-To: <20010428061557.26E213E2C@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Btw, can I also get an updated copy of uprintf.9 so Im not working off my old one? Andrew On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote: > "Andrew R. Reiter" writes: > > I was going to write this alittle over a year ago, now, but I got > > lazy^H^H^H^Hsidetracked. I really think that this should be coupled along > > with a few other of the functions from src/sys/kern/subr_prf.c since they > > all are very closely related (besides the log() functions). > > > > Nevertheless, attached is the uprintf.9 man page.. I kind of just hacked > > it up, so complete modification is welcome :-) > > Except for some minor markup issues, this looks pretty good. I think > tprintf(9) and perhaps printf(9) should also be described here. Do > you want to take a shot at it or shall I? > > Dima Dorfman > dima@unixfreak.org > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message > *-------------................................................. | Andrew R. Reiter | arr@fledge.watson.org | "It requires a very unusual mind | to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message