Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:51:40 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r260151 - head/sys/netinet6 Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=XwwMNmvobj9_hr=O86ZeLh3caSmv8Ht0gw=dH2oBMJQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52C4A118.9020000@FreeBSD.org> References: <201401010056.s010uR70070405@svn.freebsd.org> <52C4A118.9020000@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why not? Adrian On Jan 1, 2014 6:13 PM, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 01.01.2014 04:56, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Author: adrian > > Date: Wed Jan 1 00:56:26 2014 > > New Revision: 260151 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/260151 > > > > Log: > > Use an RLOCK here instead of an RWLOCK - matching all the other calls > > to lla_lookup(). > > > > This drastically reduces the very high lock contention when doing > parallel > > TCP throughput tests (> 1024 sockets) with IPv6. > > This is very hackish and not correct. > > -- > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=XwwMNmvobj9_hr=O86ZeLh3caSmv8Ht0gw=dH2oBMJQ>