From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Apr 11 20:16: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [170.1.70.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D58A37BB76 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:15:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from icarus.kfu.com (icarus.kfu.com [170.1.70.26]) by quack.kfu.com (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA89875; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:15:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from localhost by icarus.kfu.com with ESMTP (8.9.3//ident-1.0) id UAA00698; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:15:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Nick Sayer X-Sender: nsayer@icarus.kfu.com To: Palle Girgensohn Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux-communicator problem In-Reply-To: <38ECD130.EC5A2862@partitur.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ObOnTopic: If you're running NIS, you must make sure to make the ${LINUX_DIR}/etc/yp.conf file correct. This is perhaps a bit off topic, but does anyone else who has tried the new Linux Netscape Preview come away with anything other than the impression that it completely sucks ass? I've read the nice things the press has had to say and I see only the opposite. Where they say it's fast, I see it being markedly slow. Where they say it's small, I see a memory footprint of well over 60M. It can't even talk to my uw IMAP server without completely hanging. And when it does work it seems to be nothing but a gigantic billboard for AOL, Netscape and their partners. Boo! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message