From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  8 22:28:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE73516A4CE; Sun,  8 Feb 2004 22:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4B77843D31; Sun,  8 Feb 2004 22:28:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from localhost.invalid (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
	by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i196SAVe016011;
	Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:28:12 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
	Robert Golovniov <questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:28:14 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
References: <200402090618.i196I6bS008929@gw.core>
In-Reply-To: <200402090618.i196I6bS008929@gw.core>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200402082228.14658.kstewart@owt.com>
cc: Robert Golovniov <g-r-v@ukr.net>
Subject: Re: Mounting the second NTFS partition
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:28:21 -0000

On Sunday 08 February 2004 10:16 pm, Robert Golovniov wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD,
>
>   Could  anybody  help  me  in  the matter of mounting the second
> NTFS partition? It works OK with the first one (primary, ad0s1), but
> when I try running mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s2 (should be a secondary
> partition and  this  is  the  name I found in /dev...), I get an
> error that an argument is invalid. Any ideas?

It depends on how you created it. XP and W2K understand 4-primary 
partitions. So, you have ad0s1 and ad0s2 and etc. If you created as a 
logical in your extended partition, the numbering starts at ad0s5.

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html